eokahya / claude-audits-quantum-gravity
git clone https://github.com/eokahya/claude-audits-quantum-gravity.git
Claude re-derived a published one-loop quantum gravity calculation step by step: 18 tasks, 183 pages of derivations, 38 reproducible checks. It found a sign error and a missing term; the physical conclusion survived.
—
stars, 24h
+43
stars, 7 days · #1,026
+43
stars, 30 days · #6,821
43
★ total · +43% this week
8
forks · 0 open issues
Star history starts 2026-10-20; the chart appears after the second daily snapshot.
LanguageTeX
LicenseMIT
Created2026-10-16 (4d ago)
Last push4d ago
Watchers1
OwnerUser
GitHub topics
Links
README excerpt
# Claude Audits Quantum Gravity *An AI re-derived a published one-loop quantum gravity calculation step by step. It found a sign error and a missing term, and confirmed the physical conclusion.* > **The paper:** E. O. Kahya, *Auditing a quantum gravity calculation with an AI model: corrected scalar self-mass and > unchanged late-time mode functions during inflation* (submitted to arXiv, 2026). PDF · > LaTeX source This repository re-derives, step by step, a published one-loop quantum gravity calculation during inflation: the graviton correction to a massless, minimally coupled scalar on de Sitter space (Paper I, Phys. Rev. D 76, 124005 (2007)), and its use in the scalar's late-time field equation (Paper II, arXiv:0710.5282). The re-derivation was carried out with Claude (Anthropic's AI model, Claude Opus 5.5) as a checking tool. It was published by E. O. Kahya, one of the authors of both papers. Each step, from the Feynman rules (I.6)–(I.8) to the renormalized self-mass (I.167) and the late-time analysis of Paper II, was derived again from the inputs stated in the papers, keeping the dimension $`D`$ general wherever the paper does, and cross-checked with independent SymPy/mpmath code. (The bookkeeping tables of Paper I's appendix were audited rather than redone; see Limitations.) Every difference from the printed papers is classified: **4 substantive findings (S1–S4), 6 finite errors absorbed into counterterms (B1–B6) and 23 typographical errors (C1–C23)**. The complete list of findings gives each one with its evidence. **Bottom line:** the main physical conclusion of Paper II survives. The scalar's mode function receives no significant one-loop correction at late times. However, the printed self-mass-squared is $`-1`$ times the one defined by Paper I's own (I.168) (the 4-point and 3-point parts are both reversed, so their relative sign is consistent), and two entries of its final table, Table X, need correcting. **Contents:** The question · What was done · Main results · Read it in order · The paper · Complete list of findings · Full derivations · Reproduce the checks · How Claude was used · Papers · Citation --- ## The question in one picture [code] Inflation pulls long-wavelength quanta of massless fields that are not conformally invariant out of the vacuum. Gravitons are such fields, so as inflation goes on the universe fills with an ever-growing sea of infrared gravitons. The question is whether this sea changes how a massless, minimally coupled scalar (a stand-in for a very flat inflaton) propagates. All quantum corrections at one loop are contained in the scalar self-mass-squared $`M^2(x;x')`$, which enters the linearized effective field equation (Paper I, Eq. (I.168)): [code] At tree level the plane-wave mode function freezes to a constant once the mode has left the horizon: [code] Write $`M^2=\kappa^2M^2_1+O(\kappa^4)`$ and $`\Phi=u+\kappa^2\Phi_1`$, with $`\kappa^2=16\pi G`$; $`\Phi_1`$ is sourced by $`M^2_1`$, so $`\kappa^2`$ is