📈 GH Trending Explorer 🎲 Surprise me

Search: peer-review · clear

sno-ai / sno-station-skills

Sno Station Skills: 31 tested skills that turn Claude Code and Codex into one working team. Cross-vendor peer review, automatic handoff when an agent hits its quota, a one-page morning brief, work orders with proof, and a nightly loop that learns from your own sessions. Open source, installed with one sno setup.

▲ ~250/7d ★ 609 Shell 3d ago
ZiyuanDu / deepinfer-unpacked

Bringing thousands of learners together to unpack DeepInfer through peer-reviewed explanations, documentation, and hands-on examples.

▲ 105/7d ★ 105 Python 1d ago
brycewang-stanford / Awesome-Journal-Skills

Journal-specific Claude Code/Codex skill packs covering mainstream journals — AER, QJE, Nature, Cell, 管理世界, 经济研究 & 200+ more — your fast track to getting published. | 覆盖主流期刊的 Claude Code/Codex 期刊技能包,从选题、识别策略到表格规范与审稿回复全流程,助你快速发论文。

▲ ~23/7d ★ 1.3k Stata 25d ago
harshaneel / humanize

Best static AI text humanizer. Two research-grounded LLM-agnostic skills that make AI writing sound human and relatable. Nine levers, 50+ peer-reviewed sources, 2024-2026 detection literature.

▲ ~16/7d ★ 573 HTML 1mo ago
tdurieux / anonymous_github

Anonymous Github is a proxy server to support anonymous browsing of Github repositories for open-science code and data.

▲ ~2/7d ★ 2.3k JavaScript 8d ago
gxCaesar / open-research-skills

从选题到可复现发布:十个可独立安装的科研 agent skill —— 顶会/期刊论文、科研绘图、基金 proposal 撰写、方法迭代到 SOTA、冷审与代码数据发布。Ten installable agent skills for research: scientific figures, conference and journal manuscripts, research funding proposals, method development, cold review and artifact release.

▲ ~2/7d ★ 57 Python 29d ago
Consensus-NLP / consensus-mcp

Official MCP server for Consensus. Search 220M+ peer-reviewed research papers from Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and any MCP client.

▲ ~2/7d ★ 31 1mo ago
ben-m-scott / pdf-renamer

Rename peer-reviewed PDF articles to a standard naming format [(Last name, year) Title]

▲ ~0/7d ★ 43 Python 1mo ago
THUROI0787 / absent-author

Research and writing can be automated. Authorship cannot. Evidence list + agent skills for spotting AI-produced papers no human stood behind.